What Matters Most and Why.


Blogging, writing, debriefing, and emoting about all things that matter to me most [in no particular order]: Georgetown Hoyas, microfinance, R3, family, Dashfire, pizza, Detroit (and the Pistons, Tigers, Lions, and Wings), "the city of tomorrow, today", franchises, 802, Michigan football, evolution, India, dinosaurs, and of course, lists.
Jan 09 2012

Tablets for Fourth Graders.

  • Posted by: admin

Here’s an idea for a new venture as described in less than 250 words…

Fourth grade math in 1992.  I remember my teacher introducing a new topic, writing a question on the board, explaining the answer, and then handing every student the same worksheet of practice questions.  A linear curriculum for a classroom of students who differ in not only the way they learn, but in their strengths and weaknesses.  With the available resources, this made sense for 1992, but not 2012.

Addressing this archaic methodology makes education technology so exciting.  At Dashfire, we have worked with companies that help high-school teachers, alumni organizations, and teacher training.  Meanwhile, companies like Khan’s Academy (which should be used by adults too) are monumentally progressing the way children learn.  I look forward to seeing how tablets influence children’s education.  Although not initially designed for them, children have mastered the iPad, whether by sliding to unlock or playing Angry Birds.  I envision students conducting their coursework on a tablet (or to a lesser extent, computers) with intuitive programming.  The software would use how the student responds to a question – correctly, incorrectly, methodology – as a diagnostic to generate the subsequent question.  Students will learn at a pace that is appropriate for them while teachers can identify (from a tablet of course) which students need extra, real-time attention.   This would finally sideline reactive education – waiting for students to fail before addressing their needs.  I imagine that there are leading engineers and/or decision science PHDs building this technology.  And if there aren’t, let’s get started!

  • JC

    Interesting post and great sentiment about needing to improve the base-level of our education standards by “leaning into the curve” a bit more regarding prevailing technology.  The shift from “reactive & broad” to “proactive & targeted” teaching strategies is a must if we want to put our educational system back on a path of success.

    The bottom line is (like with just about anything else in education) about making the economics work.  The initial capital needs for not just the technology, but curriculum overhauls, teacher training and support services will be so intense that justifying a huge budget will have to be done through experimentation and research testing.  Then, the issue becomes what metric do you most want to influence in education via the new tablet adaptive technology/learning?  Some may argue base GPA, some will say grad/dropout rate, a few will argue college admissions, and not to mention the purists arguing for some qualitative evaluation on creativity or imagination. 

     

  • Nellie

    My preschoolers have mastered the ipad!  They love all of the spelling and math apps!  Our school has 10 ipads and i know all classrooms use them and the students love being able to learn with the technology.  It also allows the teachers to be much more creative!

  • Kartik Vengu

    But do you think that the average teacher will have this level of motivation and commitment to really make use of the progress you identify?  I would worry that the teachers use the tablet as a shorthand to avoid making copies, but still send around the same worksheet to each student’s tablet and have them fill out the problems on the tablet rather than on paper – undermining the whole point of the advanced technology we have available to us.

    I remember growing up with the advent of computer-based math learning, but despite the potential for the kinds of innovations you address here, more often than note the program just spit out problems for me to solve identical to those I would get on any paper worksheet – the only difference was that now they were on a computer screen with some pictures in the background. 

    I’m not saying that this isn’t an exciting idea or that we shouldn’t work towards it; I’m just wary of the human motivation problems inherent in any such development.

    • http://twitter.com/rickdesai rickdesai

      As JC says below, investing in teacher training and development is of equal importance.  Also, I believe the software is the game changer and the tablet is a more convenient, inexpensive delivery mechanism.  The  software – with or without the teacher – can ‘learn’ with the student to provide a more tailored, individualized curriculum.  We’ve seen basic versions of this with the GMAT and the “learning” engine is already in play with companies like Pandora. 

  • Kidistefano

    Thoughtful idea, but two things to reflect on: cost – interpersonal skills developed; achievement gap with socio-economic roots ? Id use them in my class, but there is always a but…

  • http://twitter.com/koolgurus koolgurus

    Rick,  My kid love to work on iPad. Its a nice tool to engage kids enabling learning with fun. This whole exercise motivated us to create apps(iPad) for K-8 based on common core standards. That way teachers/parents don’t have to worry about the content.
    checkout @ http://www.koolgurus.com and lets us know your feedback. Thanks!

Social

Recent Posts

Archives

Great Reads

Rickdesai